Home » London Theatre News » Review of Cleansed at The National Theatre – Dorfman Theatre

Review of Cleansed at The National Theatre – Dorfman Theatre

CleansedThe thing about not being entirely sure about what just happened in a show you’ve come out of and need to write a review for is that, in one sense, it doesn’t really matter. I’m hardly likely to stick spoilers in if I don’t even know the full significance of what went on, or how it’s all supposed to fit together. For one thing, Sarah Kane’s stage directions for Cleansed make clear the scenes take place within the grounds of a university campus; I’d never have guessed that from the set as presented here, which never really changes. It is as if everything takes place in one room – again, the script begs to differ, and had this production stayed even a little more faithful to the original instructions, it would have come across as infinitely more coherent.

Anyway, I turn quickly to the apparent provocative nature of this play, because (at the time of writing) it’s been widely reported that a number of audience members throughout this run at the National Theatre have felt it necessary to leave, because of some very graphic content. The squeamish should not, alas, read on: the stage does rather become Dismemberment Central. I’m the sort of person that becomes very aware of my external surroundings whenever things get as relentlessly tortuous as this.

The sort of thoughts that rush through my mind go something like this. “I’m at the NT. This is a play. A play at the NT. At some point the lights will come up, the characters will all come out and take a bow, all bodily parts firmly in place. We will then get up, collect bags and coats from the cloakroom, use the loo if we need to, and amble over back to Waterloo Station, and then home.

So yes, I lasted the course. There seemed to be even more nudity than blood. The show being without an interval, ‘relations’ are always over implausibly quickly. I shouldn’t have laughed, really, given a) more unconsented sex was depicted than consented relations, and b) the gruesomeness of what’s happening to these characters, who are locked in some sort of bedlam, presumably having been certified under mental health legislation. But quite why they must be treated in this horrifying manner is never really explored, though I gather it must be some sort of metaphor for how society generally treats people who don’t conform to what is widely accepted to be ‘normal’ behaviour.

Tinker (Tom Mothersdale) is clearly homophobic. It’s Carl (Peter Hobday) and Rod (George Taylor), in a relationship, who suffer disproportionately out of all the characters. To put it simply, love very literally hurts; at least Woman (Natalie Klamar) feels no pain when the end comes for her. Robin (Matthew Tennyson) is forced to eat more chocolate than even Bruce in Matilda The Musical. Grace (a highly convincing Michelle Terry) is transformed into her brother Graham (Graham Butler, one of those actors that could be reading the phone book aloud and still be thoroughly engaging), who has also been dispatched into the afterlife. The bizarre operation that enables Grace’s sex-change was probably the most sensationalist scene of all for me. But, while there were people who walked out during the performance I attended, this seemed to be out of boredom rather than shock horror. The play is a slow burner, and its minimalist script means its silences, technically always fairly short, sometimes feel awkwardly long. So long that a few people decided they’d had enough.

Is Cleansed about love? I suppose that comes through occasionally, though the more distressing elements of the show swiftly crush and shred any semblance of positive feeling. All the abuse probably desensitised me to any sentiment that may have existed, and may well, ironically, have stopped me (and anyone else in the audience at this performance) from fainting. This is violent stuff, and though I remain quite clueless as to the plot, I still found the experience a compelling one, extremely well cast and thus extremely well-acted. Horrifyingly believable, I can’t honestly say I ‘enjoyed’ it: frankly, I didn’t. But this doesn’t mean this isn’t a good play.

4 stars

Review by Chris Omaweng

You love me so much why can’t you remember my name?
Tinker practises the art of atrocity, but even he isn’t immune from the need for love. Existing on the border between beauty and brutality, Cleansed imagines a world in which language, human relationships and the body itself are pared away to bare bone.

One of Britain’s most influential playwrights, Sarah Kane (1971 – 99) receives her National Theatre debut in an unflinching new production by Katie Mitchell.

Contains graphic scenes of physical and sexual violence.
For more detailed information on content and suitability, please contact the Box Office on 020 7452 3000
Dorfman Theatre
Running time approx 1 hour 45 mins with no interval
booking to 5th May 2016



2 thoughts on “Review of Cleansed at The National Theatre – Dorfman Theatre”

  1. Hi Chris, interesting review.

    It’s interesting that you found the fact the settings were moved to one location made the play less coherent; in an interview with Katie Mitchell and Matt Trueman on Wednesday, she said that the reason why she moved the settings to one set was to make it more coherent and to bring it all together!

    I think it’s interesting that you thought Tinker was homophobic. Personally I thought he was potentially gay (or at least attracted to men) and struggling with his sexuality.

    I agree with your perception of Graham Butler as an actor. I saw him in Nell Gwynn and Richard II over the summer and think he is just a joy to watch.

    I also agree about the boredom. I didn’t find it shocking, and actually found it quite tame to what it could have been. I can’t usually watch violence, but didn’t look away once. It was all expected.

    I didn’t think it was great, but still think it’s worth a watch. 3* for me!

  2. Michael ellison

    An interesting.. ahem.. review for me in deciding if it is worth spending my hard earned on this play. The review states:

    – I’m not sure what happened in the play
    – This production ignored the script’s stage directions, adding to the play’s incoherence
    – I laughed inappropriately at displays of unconsensual sex and grisly injuries inflicted on the characters
    – Why the characters suffer horrifying treatment is never really explored
    – Audience members walking out seemed to the reviewer more about boredom than shock horror.

    And for me non-sequitur of the year, reviewer rates play 4 out of 5 stars!?

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top