Home » London Theatre Reviews » Flightpath by James Burke at Jack Studio Theatre | Review

Flightpath by James Burke at Jack Studio Theatre | Review

A briskly-paced production, Flightpath involves a number of storylines in which the action shifts between. To break the ice, the audience is invited to – here comes that dreaded word – participate in a plot-related activity. It involved something I hadn’t personally done in at least twenty-five years, so I wasn’t very good at it, though thankfully there were enough people in the audience who were more than competent, so in the end, it didn’t really matter. I am, for obvious reasons, being candid about what is involved, though I confirm nobody in the audience is asked to get on stage.

Flightpath by James BurkeThe three-strong cast (James Burke, Kelly Davie and Derek Jeck) take on at least a dozen characters between them, across different generations and locations. Invariably this involves taking on different accents, some more convincing than others – and, being a Glasgow-based theatre company, Brief Palava’s team pull off Scots accents that not only don’t go on a UK tour of their own but are comparatively better than some Scots ‘accents’ I’ve heard on West End stages over the years.

For one engineer, what comes across at face value as a linguistic challenge is eventually revealed as love-related – that is, he would have been tongue-tied regardless of his fluency in British English. I was rather impressed with the speed of the scene changes as well as the shifts into different characters, sometimes with a substantial age gap from the previous one. A seemingly banal discussion between friends on a plane soon gives way to an in-depth discussion between a journalist and what used to be his line manager about an ongoing (journalistic) investigation into the circumstances surrounding a body that fell from the sky.

The use of child characters is the source of much of the show’s humour, particularly when what they have been told by parents and teachers is taken to its logical conclusion, given the limited information supplied. It’s a clever device, as it doesn’t belittle child-like ways of thinking, but rather places the onus on the grown-ups to provide sufficient context. Davie’s grandmother figure unfortunately does one of those silly walks that no actual elderly person does, but she is at least credited with a sharp mind and having the time and inclination to speak at length about aviation to her inquisitive grandson.

The range of topics covered is broad for a single-act play, and there’s much to think about, even in the scenes that come across as little more than comedy sketches. And yet it doesn’t feel rushed. Burke’s investigative journalist character resigns in such a way that reinforces the view that employees don’t so much leave companies as managers. A would-be woman pilot is discouraged by her father from pursuing such a career, but then he struggles to articulate what she ‘should’ be doing instead. It’s relatable, I would have thought, for anyone who wasn’t supported by their family in their chosen vocation, even when what they wanted to do was entirely reasonable.

While some scenes make more sense than others, this appears to be deliberate. The production suggests that there are things about the skies that have yet to be explained. The passenger flight that disappeared in March 2014 whilst flying over the Indian Ocean isn’t directly or indirectly referenced in the show, but it’s the sort of thing that comes to mind. I felt as though the show was almost crying out for a second act, or a companion piece, in which all the things that put people off having anything to do with flying are explored – phobias, the tedium of airport security, terrible food, lack of legroom, and so on.

Interestingly, the production company’s social media suggests the team took a train down from Scotland to London rather than a flight. If a show about planes could be as riveting as this one, one about the railways could prove equally surprisingly intriguing, and definitely just as chaotic. As for this show, it’s a delightful romp through different viewpoints on planes and flying – a lively and spirited journey.

4 stars

Review by Chris Omaweng

Flightpath: A Surreal Comedy about Things Falling from Planes
A man, a plane, a cadaver: pandemonium!
High above the earth, where hunks of metal soar on invisible winds, the very fabric of reality breaks down… When an unidentified body falls impossibly fast from a plane which never existed, one journalist – determined to make sense of it all – resolves to take up the case.

When what he finds goes deeper than a single story could, he quickly finds himself picking battle lines in a fight between reason and madness. Stitching up a story from loosely related scenes, Flightpath weaves a tapestry of craziness which might just make sense of the spinning world we live in.
Brace yourselves for this colourful comedy about humanity’s fascination with the skies.

The Creative Team
Writer | James Burke
Director | Tomaž Krajnc
Design | Lu Herbert
Lighting Design | Laurel Marks
Sound Design | Kristina Kapilin
Producer | Brief Palava
Running time: 75 minutes
The Cast | James Burke, Kelly Davie, Derek Jeck

Brief Palava present
by James Burke
Tuesday 17 – Saturday 28 May 2022

Related News & Reviews Past & Present


1 thought on “Flightpath by James Burke at Jack Studio Theatre | Review”

  1. I have recently seen the “play” by the Brief Palava group, my experience have been overwhelming negative.
    The “play” could have been a podcast because hardly any effort were made to provide a visual reference, the Palava group thought that shouting was a good replacement for acting, the various episodes that should make up the storyline, are confusing because there are no scenery or significant props changes and the group is not good enough to provide characterisation (but still they shout a lot) and the jokes were both pathetic and panto-like.
    The sparse audience seemed to laugh at the grimaces of the cast, and I guess that being drunk of intellectually challenged could have been a bonus in appreciating the performance.
    The “story line” was all over the place, practically unintelligible, and at the end of the day dull, pretentious and child like.
    Whatever the nonsensical content could have still yielded was wasted away by poor execution.
    Over all not enjoyable.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top